MOT cost .

← All 2008 variants

Peugeot

2008 GT EV

4,924 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where 2008 GT EVs pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 8.5 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

86.0%

Pass-after-fix

4.0%

Fail

9.8%

Avg miles

26,866

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ exempt (EV)

Electric and hydrogen vehicles are exempt from all UK clean air zone charges.

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 4,924 tests

Pass rate climbs 1.7 points across the cohorts — newer 2008 GT EV examples clear the test more reliably than the early cars.

2018–2020 cohort 1,728

Pass

85.0%

Fail

10.5%

PRS

4.3%

Avg mileage at test

30,467 mi

2021+ cohort 3,196

Pass

86.6%

Fail

9.4%

PRS

3.8%

Avg mileage at test

24,921 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

2008 Gt Ev: a strong MOT record by UK norms

Across 1,070 MOT tests, the 2008 Gt Ev returns 90.3% first-time pass — comfortably ahead of the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is wipers that don't clear the screen. A defective wiper blade and worn suspension bushes round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 23,764, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

ABI Insurance Group

Group 12–22

Below the fleet average — generally reasonable to insure. Lower groups cost less to insure; UK fleet average is around Group 22.

Source: ABI Group Rating Panel · administered by Thatcham Research · groups cover standard variants; performance trims may sit higher. Browse all insurance groups →

12–22

out of 50

Compare quotes →

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen

    184 occurrences · 3.7% of tests

  2. 02

    Wiper blade defective

    117 occurrences · 2.4% of tests

  3. 03

    A tyre seriously damaged

    81 occurrences · 1.6% of tests

  4. 04

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    62 occurrences · 1.3% of tests

  5. 05

    Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view

    49 occurrences · 1.0% of tests

  6. 06

    A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn

    46 occurrences · 0.9% of tests

  7. 07

    A tyre cords visible or damaged

    26 occurrences · 0.5% of tests

  8. 08

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    20 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  9. 09

    A tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative

    18 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  10. 10

    A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage

    17 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 3 failures

£100£185

If every one of this 2008 GT EV's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. A 1.7-point gap between bands is modest — the year you buy Peugeot 2008 GT EV makes a small but real difference to MOT outcomes.

Best band to buy

86.6%

2021+ registration

the 2021-on band climbs to 86.6% — a 1.7-point improvement. Tests in this band average 24,921 miles — roughly 6K miles fewer on the clock than the older band. Failures here are mostly wear items: does not clear the windscreen effectively, blade defective — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band. Post-2020 examples are early in their MOT life and generally show the cleanest records.

Band to be cautious about

85.0%

2018–2020 registration

On the 2018–2020 band, the data shows a 85.0% pass rate against a fleet average of 86.6% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: does not clear the windscreen effectively, blade defective, and tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm. Average mileage on test for this band is 30,467 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2021+ (86.6% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: 2018-2020 (85.0% pass). That's a 1.7-point spread across 1,728 older tests and 3,196 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

EV King · affiliate

EV charging & accessories

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Buying or keeping a 2008 GT EV?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a 2008 GT EV and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.