MOT cost .

← All Swift variants

Suzuki Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev
MOT 2024

Photo: PekePON, CC BY-SA 3.0

Suzuki

Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev

1,829 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhevs pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 14.2 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

91.7%

Pass-after-fix

2.5%

Fail

5.4%

Avg miles

22,237

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ compliant

Petrol cars first registered from January 2006 meet Euro 4 — compliant in London ULEZ, Birmingham CAZ, Bristol CAZ, and Glasgow LEZ.

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 1,829 tests

Pass rate is broadly flat across the cohorts — new and old Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev examples track each other at the test bay.

2018–2020 cohort 771

Pass

91.2%

Fail

6.2%

PRS

2.5%

Avg mileage at test

25,401 mi

2021+ cohort 1,058

Pass

92.2%

Fail

4.8%

PRS

2.5%

Avg mileage at test

19,924 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev: a strong MOT record by UK norms

Across 1,829 MOT tests, the Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev returns 91.7% first-time pass — comfortably ahead of the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is wipers that don't clear the screen. A defective wiper blade and windscreen damage round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 22,237, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen

    30 occurrences · 1.6% of tests

  2. 02

    Wiper blade defective

    28 occurrences · 1.5% of tests

  3. 03

    Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view

    24 occurrences · 1.3% of tests

  4. 04

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    21 occurrences · 1.1% of tests

  5. 05

    A tyre seriously damaged

    6 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  6. 06

    Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn

    6 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  7. 07

    A tyre seriously damaged

    6 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  8. 08

    An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning

    5 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  9. 09

    A wheel with a loose or missing wheel nut, bolt or stud

    4 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  10. 10

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    4 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 3 failures

£100£185

If every one of this Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. Pass rates barely move across bands here, so the year you buy Suzuki Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev makes little measurable difference to MOT outcomes.

Best band to buy

92.2%

2021+ registration

the 2021-on band climbs to 92.2% — a 1.0-point improvement. Tests in this band average 19,924 miles — roughly 5K miles fewer on the clock than the older band. Failures here are mostly wear items: blade defective, does not clear the windscreen effectively — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band. Post-2020 examples are early in their MOT life and generally show the cleanest records.

Band to be cautious about

91.2%

2018–2020 registration

On the 2018–2020 band, the data shows a 91.2% pass rate against a fleet average of 92.2% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: does not clear the windscreen effectively, damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view, and tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm. Average mileage on test for this band is 25,401 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2021+ (92.2% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: 2018-2020 (91.2% pass). That's a 1.0-point spread across 771 older tests and 1,058 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Buying or keeping a Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Swift Sport Boosterjet Mhev and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.