MOT cost .

← All Juke variants

Nissan

Juke Acenta Dig T

4,847 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where Juke Acenta Dig Ts pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 11.2 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

88.7%

Pass-after-fix

3.2%

Fail

7.7%

Avg miles

24,414

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ compliant

Petrol cars first registered from January 2006 meet Euro 4 — compliant in London ULEZ, Birmingham CAZ, Bristol CAZ, and Glasgow LEZ.

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 4,847 tests

Pass rate climbs 6.8 points across the cohorts — newer Juke Acenta Dig T examples clear the test more reliably than the early cars.

2018–2020 cohort 2,382

Pass

85.2%

Fail

10.0%

PRS

4.2%

Avg mileage at test

26,903 mi

2021+ cohort 2,465

Pass

92.0%

Fail

5.5%

PRS

2.2%

Avg mileage at test

22,016 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Juke Acenta Dig-T: a strong MOT record by UK norms

Across 1,517 MOT tests, the Juke Acenta Dig-T returns 90.0% first-time pass — comfortably ahead of the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is wipers that don't clear the screen. A defective wiper blade and tyre tread under the limit round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 20,772, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

ABI Insurance Group

Group 10–22

Below the fleet average — generally reasonable to insure. Lower groups cost less to insure; UK fleet average is around Group 22.

Source: ABI Group Rating Panel · administered by Thatcham Research · groups cover standard variants; performance trims may sit higher. Browse all insurance groups →

10–22

out of 50

Compare quotes →

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen

    150 occurrences · 3.1% of tests

  2. 02

    Wiper blade defective

    80 occurrences · 1.7% of tests

  3. 03

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    62 occurrences · 1.3% of tests

  4. 04

    A tyre seriously damaged

    45 occurrences · 0.9% of tests

  5. 05

    a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm

    34 occurrences · 0.7% of tests

  6. 06

    A suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn

    28 occurrences · 0.6% of tests

  7. 07

    Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view

    19 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  8. 08

    A tyre cords visible or damaged

    14 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  9. 09

    Brake disc or drum significantly and obviously worn

    9 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  10. 10

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    7 occurrences · 0.1% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 4 failures

£180£345

If every one of this Juke Acenta Dig T's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. A 6.8-point gap between bands means the year you buy Nissan Juke Acenta Dig T has a real effect on what turns up at the garage.

Best band to buy

92.0%

2021+ registration

the 2021-on band climbs to 92.0% — a 6.8-point improvement. Failures here are mostly wear items: does not clear the windscreen effectively, tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band. Post-2020 examples are early in their MOT life and generally show the cleanest records.

Band to be cautious about

85.2%

2018–2020 registration

On the 2018–2020 band, the data shows a 85.2% pass rate against a fleet average of 92.0% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: does not clear the windscreen effectively, blade defective, and tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm. Average mileage on test for this band is 26,903 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2021+ (92.0% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: 2018-2020 (85.2% pass). That's a 6.8-point spread across 2,382 older tests and 2,465 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Owner reports · Honest John

What owners actually report.

Verbatim faults logged by owners on honestjohn.co.uk over recent years. We didn't summarise — these are the words people typed in.

What's good

Poor practicality, lacklustre 1.6-litre engines, high number of automatic gearbox failures.

Where it falls short

The Nissan Juke is let down by poor boot space and cramped rear seats, but scores well for its raised driving position and value for money.

Recent owner-reported faults

  1. 22 Aug 2017

    Report of another CVT failure on a 2013 Nissan Juke, this one at 30,000 miles and at 4 years old. Owner threatening Small Claims against supplying dealer.

  2. 3 Aug 2017

    Report of cylinder head or head gasket failure in 2013 Nissan Juke 1.6i CVT at 30,000 miles. Had been Nissan dealer serviced on time since new. Nissan has offered 75% of parts cost, but not labour.

  3. 23 Jul 2017

    Problem reported with CVT tranmission of 2012 Nissan Juke purchased used in August 2012 with 14,500 miles, now at 20,500 miles. Last week the gear box appeared to start going wrong, when owner put it in reverse it would judder and stop. If he tried once or twice it would eventually engage. The problem still exists but it is also happening when he puts it into drive.

  4. 14 Jul 2017

    Report of CVT transmission of 2012 Nissan Juke failing at 28,000 miles and Nissan dealer quoting £7,000 to replace it.

  5. 25 May 2017

    Report of clutch failing on another 2014 Nissan Juke at 15,000 miles. Nissan blamed driver.

  6. 24 May 2017

    Report of clutch failing on 2014 Nissan Juke 1.2DIGT at 22,000 miles, 5,000 miles after used purchase in December 2016.

  7. 3 May 2017

    Report of engine problems with used March 2015 Nissan Juke 1.2DIGT bought from a Nissan dealer in December 2016. Owner phoned in February 2017 to be told there was a manufacturer TSB because the wrong pistons had been fitted. When car was returned the engine was rattling and the radiator fan was on constantly. Dealer then booked it in again, took the engine apart and requested a new engine from Nissan. Nissan rejected this and told dealer to replace pistons again. Turned out that timing chain and crankshaft has also been replaced prior to purchase. Our recommendations is to reject the car outright.

  8. 29 Apr 2017

    Report of noises from transmission of 12,500 mile October 2012 Nissan Juke CVT, diagnosed by dealer as transmission failure and quoted at £5,000 for a new transmission. Owner took this up with Nissan Customer Services and transmission was replaced FoC.

  9. 21 Apr 2017

    Report of timing belt failure of 28,000 mile 2013 Nissan Juke 1.5DCI. Nissan paid 75% of the cost of a new engine.

  10. 21 Mar 2017

    Report of CVT transmission of 2012/62 Nissan Juke bought 2nd hand failing at 20,000 miles, soon after private purchase. Engine kept shutting down when putting it into drive or reverse and made noises sometimes. Tried a change of fluid which improves it for a while but then the transmission became worse again.

  11. 25 Jan 2017

    CVT failure reported on 2013 Nissan Juke at 49,000 miles. Independent specialist repairer is quoting £3,500. Owner reluctant to have Jule transported to a Nissan dealer.

  12. 8 Jul 2016

    Report of CVT failure on Nissan Juke. Estimated repair: £7,000, but Nissan reduced the cost to just £640. Unfortunately, transmission oil radiator leak found when dismantling and charged £600 for that so total bill £1,240.

Source: honestjohn.co.uk · 30 reports indexed, top 12 shown

Buying or keeping a Juke Acenta Dig T?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Juke Acenta Dig T and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.