MOT cost .

Honda

Cbf

6,720 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where Cbfs pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 4.2 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

81.7%

Pass-after-fix

6.6%

Fail

11.4%

Avg miles

15,207

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 6,714 tests

Pass rate climbs 7.8 points across the cohorts — newer Cbf examples clear the test more reliably than the early cars.

Pre-2018 cohort 3,513

Pass

77.9%

Fail

13.6%

PRS

8.1%

Avg mileage at test

18,839 mi

2018–2020 cohort 3,201

Pass

85.8%

Fail

9.0%

PRS

4.9%

Avg mileage at test

11,230 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Cbf: above-average pass rates, with caveats

Across 5,335 MOT tests, the Cbf returns 82.1% first-time pass — above the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is tyre tread under the limit. Transmission belt, chain and brake pads worn below 1.0 mm round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 13,696, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

ABI Insurance Group

Group 10–26

Below the fleet average — generally reasonable to insure. Lower groups cost less to insure; UK fleet average is around Group 22.

Source: ABI Group Rating Panel · administered by Thatcham Research · groups cover standard variants; performance trims may sit higher. Browse all insurance groups →

10–26

out of 50

Compare quotes →

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    101 occurrences · 1.5% of tests

  2. 02

    A transmission belt, chain, sprocket or pulley excessively loose or worn

    90 occurrences · 1.3% of tests

  3. 03

    A shock absorber not functioning or leaking severely

    65 occurrences · 1.0% of tests

  4. 04

    Brake lining or pad worn below 1.0mm

    59 occurrences · 0.9% of tests

  5. 05

    Reflector missing or reflecting white to the rear

    58 occurrences · 0.9% of tests

  6. 06

    Steering head bearings excessively stiff, notchy, or with excessive wear or play

    56 occurrences · 0.8% of tests

  7. 07

    The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements

    51 occurrences · 0.8% of tests

  8. 08

    Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning

    42 occurrences · 0.6% of tests

  9. 09

    A footrest missing or insecure

    39 occurrences · 0.6% of tests

  10. 10

    A transmission belt, chain, sprocket or pulley excessively loose or worn

    38 occurrences · 0.6% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 2 failures

£140£255

If every one of this Cbf's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. A 7.8-point gap between bands means the year you buy Honda Cbf has a real effect on what turns up at the garage.

Best band to buy

85.8%

2018–2020 registration

the 2018–2020 band climbs to 85.8% — a 7.8-point improvement. Tests in this band average 11,230 miles — roughly 8K miles fewer on the clock than the older band. Failures here are mostly wear items: tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, excessively loose — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band. The stricter post-2018 MOT test rules meant manufacturers had to tighten up emissions and electrical checks, but this band still shows far fewer major failures on suspension and bodywork than the older fleet.

Band to be cautious about

77.9%

Pre-2018 registration

On the older band (pre-2018), the data shows a 77.9% pass rate against a fleet average of 85.8% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, excessively loose, and too high. Average mileage on test for this band is 18,839 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2018-2020 (85.8% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: pre-2018 (77.9% pass). That's a 7.8-point spread across 3,513 older tests and 3,201 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Buying or keeping a Cbf?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Cbf and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.