MOT cost .

← All Puma variants

Ford

Puma Titanium Auto

2,232 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where Puma Titanium Autos pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 15.1 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

92.6%

Pass-after-fix

2.2%

Fail

4.9%

Avg miles

20,738

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ compliant

Petrol cars first registered from January 2006 meet Euro 4 — compliant in London ULEZ, Birmingham CAZ, Bristol CAZ, and Glasgow LEZ.

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 2,232 tests

Pass rate drops 4.4 points across the cohorts — recent Puma Titanium Auto examples are doing worse than the early cars at the same tested age.

2018–2020 cohort 819

Pass

95.4%

Fail

2.9%

PRS

1.3%

Avg mileage at test

21,522 mi

2021+ cohort 1,413

Pass

90.9%

Fail

6.1%

PRS

2.6%

Avg mileage at test

20,284 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Puma Titanium Auto: a strong MOT record by UK norms

Across 664 MOT tests, the Puma Titanium Auto returns 92.2% first-time pass — comfortably ahead of the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is a seriously damaged tyre. A tyre with the cords showing and windscreen damage round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 16,024, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

ABI Insurance Group

Group 15–23

Below the fleet average — generally reasonable to insure. Lower groups cost less to insure; UK fleet average is around Group 22.

Source: ABI Group Rating Panel · administered by Thatcham Research · groups cover standard variants; performance trims may sit higher. Browse all insurance groups →

15–23

out of 50

Compare quotes →

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm

    24 occurrences · 1.1% of tests

  2. 02

    A tyre seriously damaged

    16 occurrences · 0.7% of tests

  3. 03

    Wiper blade defective

    16 occurrences · 0.7% of tests

  4. 04

    Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view

    8 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  5. 05

    Lamp showing red light to the front, white light to the rear or has heavily reduced light intensity

    7 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  6. 06

    A tyre cords visible or damaged

    5 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  7. 07

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    5 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  8. 08

    A tyre seriously damaged

    4 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  9. 09

    Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements

    4 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  10. 10

    A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning

    4 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 2 failures

£100£205

If every one of this Puma Titanium Auto's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. A 4.4-point gap between bands means the year you buy Ford Puma Titanium Auto has a real effect on what turns up at the garage.

Best band to buy

95.4%

2018–2020 registration

the 2018–2020 band climbs to 95.4% — a 4.4-point improvement. Failures here are mostly wear items: less than 1.5 mm thick, blade defective — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band.

Band to be cautious about

90.9%

2021+ registration

On the 2021-on band, the data shows a 90.9% pass rate against a fleet average of 95.4% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: less than 1.5 mm thick, has a cut in excess of the…, and blade defective. Average mileage on test for this band is 20,284 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2018-2020 (95.4% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: 2021+ (90.9% pass). That's a 4.4-point spread across 1,413 older tests and 819 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Buying or keeping a Puma Titanium Auto?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Puma Titanium Auto and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.