MOT cost .

Triumph

Thruxton

3,895 MOT tests analysed. sits above the UK fleet average — here's where Thruxtons pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 12.7 points above the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — a confident result.

Pass

90.2%

Pass-after-fix

5.2%

Fail

4.5%

Avg miles

9,146

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ borderline — check VRM

This model's production run straddles the January 2006 Euro 4 cutoff. Individual cars vary — check your registration plate on the government's ULEZ checker. Daily charges if driven in the zone: London £12.50 · Birmingham £8.00 .

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 3,867 tests

Pass rate climbs 1.6 points across the cohorts — newer Thruxton examples clear the test more reliably than the early cars.

Pre-2018 cohort 3,193

Pass

89.8%

Fail

5.0%

PRS

5.0%

Avg mileage at test

10,046 mi

2018–2020 cohort 674

Pass

91.4%

Fail

2.4%

PRS

5.9%

Avg mileage at test

5,148 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Thruxton: a strong MOT record by UK norms

Across 2,842 MOT tests, the Thruxton returns 91.1% first-time pass — comfortably ahead of the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is a non-conforming number plate. A missing rear reflector and headlamp missing, inoperative round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 8,894, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements

    28 occurrences · 0.7% of tests

  2. 02

    Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements

    17 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  3. 03

    A headlamp missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED

    17 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  4. 04

    Rate of flashing not between 60 and 120 times per minute

    17 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  5. 05

    Brake lining or pad worn below 1.0mm

    14 occurrences · 0.4% of tests

  6. 06

    Reflector missing or reflecting white to the rear

    12 occurrences · 0.3% of tests

  7. 07

    Excessive fluctuation in brake effort through each wheel revolution

    9 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  8. 08

    An exhaust silencer marked ‘NOT FOR ROAD USE’, ‘TRACK USE ONLY’ or similar words

    8 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  9. 09

    A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning

    7 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

  10. 10

    Projected beam image is obviously incorrect

    6 occurrences · 0.2% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 4 failures

£165£370

If every one of this Thruxton's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. A 1.6-point gap between bands is modest — the year you buy Triumph Thruxton makes a small but real difference to MOT outcomes.

Best band to buy

91.4%

2018–2020 registration

the 2018–2020 band climbs to 91.4% — a 1.6-point improvement. Failures here are mostly wear items: tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, flashing more than 120 times a minute — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band. The stricter post-2018 MOT test rules meant manufacturers had to tighten up emissions and electrical checks, but this band still shows far fewer major failures on suspension and bodywork than the older fleet.

Band to be cautious about

89.8%

Pre-2018 registration

On the older band (pre-2018), the data shows a 89.8% pass rate against a fleet average of 91.4% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: tread depth is below minimum requirements of 1.0mm, does not conform to the specified requirements, and not working on dipped beam. Average mileage on test for this band is 10,046 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2018-2020 (91.4% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: pre-2018 (89.8% pass). That's a 1.6-point spread across 3,193 older tests and 674 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Recall history

6 UK recalls on record.

The Thruxton has 6 official UK vehicle recalls covering defect details, remedies, and affected build dates.

See all recalls

Buying or keeping a Thruxton?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Thruxton and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.