MOT cost .

← All Vito variants

Mercedes Benz Vito 114 Progressive Cdi
MOT 2024

Photo: Alexander Migl, CC BY-SA 4.0

Mercedes Benz

Vito 114 Progressive Cdi

1,762 MOT tests analysed. lands in the middle of the pack — here's where Vito 114 Progressive Cdis pass, fail, and end up on the retest sheet.

That's 1.5 points below the UK fleet average across our 1,984 tracked models — buyers should expect more first-time fails than the typical UK car.

Pass

76.0%

Pass-after-fix

4.5%

Fail

18.3%

Avg miles

55,350

Pass + Pass-after-fix + Fail = 100%

ULEZ compliant

Diesel cars registered from September 2015 generally meet Euro 6 — compliant in London ULEZ, Birmingham CAZ, Bristol CAZ, and Glasgow LEZ.

UK ULEZ & CAZ guide →

Performance by cohort

2 year bands · 1,762 tests

Pass rate is broadly flat across the cohorts — new and old Vito 114 Progressive Cdi examples track each other at the test bay.

2018–2020 cohort 357

Pass

76.5%

Fail

19.9%

PRS

3.4%

Avg mileage at test

64,670 mi

2021+ cohort 1,405

Pass

75.9%

Fail

17.9%

PRS

4.8%

Avg mileage at test

52,957 mi

Cohort = vehicle's first-registration year band. Same model, different generations of build.

The picture

Vito 114 Progressive Cdi: middle-of-the-pack on first-time pass

Across 1,762 MOT tests, the Vito 114 Progressive Cdi returns 76.0% first-time pass — roughly in line with the UK fleet average. The single most-logged Major fail is wipers that don't clear the screen. A defective wiper blade and windscreen damage round out the top three. Average tested mileage sits at 55,350, which is the lens to read those failure rankings through. If you own one and the next test is close, the ranked list below is a sensible pre-test checklist.

Top ten reasons for rejection.

Filter failures:

  1. 01

    Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen

    82 occurrences · 4.7% of tests

  2. 02

    Wiper blade defective

    59 occurrences · 3.3% of tests

  3. 03

    Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view

    59 occurrences · 3.3% of tests

  4. 04

    A tyre seriously damaged

    40 occurrences · 2.3% of tests

  5. 05

    a brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm

    39 occurrences · 2.2% of tests

  6. 06

    Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction

    34 occurrences · 1.9% of tests

  7. 07

    A tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative

    29 occurrences · 1.6% of tests

  8. 08

    A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources

    26 occurrences · 1.5% of tests

  9. 09

    A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage

    25 occurrences · 1.4% of tests

  10. 10

    Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen

    22 occurrences · 1.2% of tests

Counts cover Major and Dangerous defects logged at test. Advisory items excluded so this shows why a car was rejected, not just what the tester flagged in passing.

Worst-case fix budget · top 3 failures

£120£250

If every one of this Vito 114 Progressive Cdi's most-logged Major fails hit at the same MOT, that's the real-world UK garage range. Reality is usually one or two items, not all of them. Open the estimator →

Try the calculator

Build your own retest budget.

Year-band analysis

Best year to buy. Worst to avoid.

First-time MOT pass rate split by registration band. Pass rates barely move across bands here, so the year you buy Mercedes Benz Vito 114 Progressive Cdi makes little measurable difference to MOT outcomes.

Best band to buy

76.5%

2018–2020 registration

the 2018–2020 band climbs to 76.5% — a 0.5-point improvement. Failures here are mostly wear items: does not clear the windscreen effectively, damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view — the structural issues that drag down older examples don't appear in the top-10 for this band.

Band to be cautious about

75.9%

2021+ registration

On the 2021-on band, the data shows a 75.9% pass rate against a fleet average of 76.5% on the newer band. The main culprits logged at test: does not clear the windscreen effectively, blade defective, and damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view. Average mileage on test for this band is 52,957 miles — high-mileage wear items are a recurring theme.

Best band to buy: 2018-2020 (76.5% first-time pass). Worst band to avoid: 2021+ (75.9% pass). That's a 0.5-point spread across 1,405 older tests and 357 newer ones — year of build makes a material difference on this model.

Year-spread leaderboard →

Tools that pre-empt a retest.

Picked against this car's top failure patterns. Affiliate links to Amazon UK — we earn a small cut at no cost to you. Disclosed up-front, doesn't shape the data.

My Motor World · affiliate

Parts & supplies for this fix

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Book a mobile mechanic

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Buying or keeping a Vito 114 Progressive Cdi?

Use the failure ranking as a pre-test checklist or a haggling lever. Treat the headline pass rate as a fleet-wide trend, not a guarantee on any individual car.

If you own a Vito 114 Progressive Cdi and your last MOT looked nothing like the ranked failures above, that's normal — individual cars vary widely. The ranking shows the patterns testers flag most often across the country.