MOT cost .

Toyota

Rav4

32 UK vehicle recalls on record for this model, listed most recent first.

If your Rav4 is covered by any of these notices, contact your authorised Toyota dealer. All recall work is carried out free of charge.

Notices on record

32

Toyota Rav4 · DVSA register

All recall notices.

  1. Parking Assist ECU reprogram on multiple models

    R/2025/466 · 1 Dec 2025

    1 Dec 2025

    Defect

    For certain vehicles equipped with a Parking Assist ECU a component of the Panoramic View Monitor (PVM) system that displays the rear view image the software may cause the rear view image to freeze or not display

    Remedy

    Reprogram the parking assist ECU.

    Build window

    Built 21 Oct 2022 – 9 Jun 2025

    ~8,802 vehicles affected

  2. Combination Meter Reprogramming on Multiple Models

    R/2025/270 · 24 Nov 2025

    24 Nov 2025

    Defect

    For certain vehicles equipped with the combination meter system (where various information is displayed) that due to an improper programming of the combination meter unnecessarily repetitive data is written to a memory device. This may cause the memory device to deteriorate and the monitor to not display during the meter at start up and remain in this state permanently.

    Remedy

    Reprogram or replace the combination meter.

    Build window

    Built 3 Jan 2022 – 17 Feb 2025

    ~5,112 vehicles affected

  3. On affected vehicles there is a possibility that the DCM may not complete the shutdown process within a specific period of time when the ignition is turned off causing the DCM to not restart at the next ignition cycle and making the e-Call function unavailable. As a result the vehicles do not comply with relevant regulations.

    R/2023/279 · 12 Oct 2023

    12 Oct 2023

    Defect

    On affected vehicles there is a possibility that the DCM may not complete the shutdown process within a specific period of time when the ignition is turned off causing the DCM to not restart at the next ignition cycle and making the e-Call function unavailable. As a result the vehicles do not comply with relevant regulations.

    Remedy

    The software of the DCM (Data Communication Module) will be updated via an Over the Air (OTA) wireless update.

    Build window

    Built 23 Jan 2023 – 18 Jul 2023

    ~27,327 vehicles affected

  4. The force-limiter in the seat belt retractor may not operate as designed

    R/2022/326 · 23 Jan 2023

    23 Jan 2023

    Defect

    The subject front seat belt assemblies are service parts designed for certain Toyota and Lexus models containing a seat belt retractor with a force-limiter function using a torsion shaft which helps control the loads on the occupant applied by the shoulder belt after the seat belt retractor locks up during a crash. During production the torsion shaft may have been manufactured incorrectly and the seat belt may not operate as designed allowing the seat belt to extend further than intended after locking. This can increase the amount of forward displacement of the occupant increasing the risk of an injury in the event of a crash severe enough to activate a force-limiter.

    Remedy

    To inspect and replace the seat belt assembly if required.

    Build window

    Built 7 Aug 2003 – 9 Sep 2005

    ~2 vehicles affected

  5. THE EMERGENCY CALLING SYSTEM (eCall) MAY NOT FUNCTION WHEN REQUIRED

    R/2021/315 · 15 Nov 2021

    15 Nov 2021

    Defect

    The emergency calling system (eCall) may not function when required.

    Remedy

    Inspect the emergency calling system and update DCM software. If the DCM is found to be damaged replace it with updated software.

    Build window

    Built 27 Aug 2020 – 15 Mar 2021

    ~26,575 vehicles affected

  6. THE EMERGENCY CALLING SYSTEM (eCall) MAY NOT FUNCTION WHEN REQUIRED

    R/2021/315 · 15 Nov 2021

    15 Nov 2021

    Defect

    The emergency calling system (eCall) may not function when required.

    Remedy

    Inspect the emergency calling system and update DCM software. If the DCM is found to be damaged replace it with updated software.

    Build window

    Built 14 Jul 2020 – 9 Mar 2021

    ~26,575 vehicles affected

  7. THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE EXHAUST GAS RECIRCULATION COOLER COULD DEVELOP AN INTERNAL COOLANT LEAK

    R/2021/104 · 31 May 2021

    31 May 2021

    Defect

    A possibility that the Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) cooler could develop an internal coolant leak

    Remedy

    Replace the EGR cooler in all involved vehicles and if necessary replace the inlet manifold.

    Build window

    Built 12 Jun 2015 – 31 May 2018

    ~24,241 vehicles affected

  8. TAKATA AIRBAG INFLATOR MAY RUPTURE ON DEPLOYMENT

    R/2020/019 · 5 Oct 2020

    5 Oct 2020

    Defect

    The absorption of moisture into the driver�s airbag propellant could lead to slow deployment or inflator rupture

    Remedy

    Replace the airbag inflator or the airbag assembly. Toyota is still preparing for the development and production of the remedy parts

    Build window

    Built 5 Jun 1997 – 31 Aug 1999

    ~37,586 vehicles affected

  9. THE FRONT LOWER SUSPENSION ARMS MAY HAVE CRACKS ON SOME PORTIONS OF ITS SURFACE

    R/2020/142 · 3 Aug 2020

    3 Aug 2020

    Defect

    The front lower suspension arms may have cracks on some portions of its surface.

    Remedy

    Replace the front lower arms of affected vehicles.

    Build window

    Built 25 Sep 2019 – 25 Oct 2019

    ~791 vehicles affected

  10. BRAKE BOOSTER PUMP MAY STOP WORKING

    R/2019/248 · 4 Nov 2019

    4 Nov 2019

    Defect

    An electrical connection within the motor may cause the brake booster pump to stop operating

    Remedy

    Inspect and replace the brake booster pump assembly if necessary.

    Build window

    Built 26 Apr 2019 – 3 Jun 2019

    ~2,146 vehicles affected

  11. THE EMERGENCY CALLING SYSTEM MAY NOT BE ENABLED

    R/2019/122 · 11 May 2019

    11 May 2019

    Defect

    There is a possibility that the emergency calling system has not been activated.

    Remedy

    Inspect and activate the emergency call system if necessary.

    Build window

    Built 31 Oct 2018 – 6 Apr 2019

    ~3,484 vehicles affected

  12. INCORRECT TIGHTENING TORQUE WAS POSSIBLY APPLIED DURING PREVIOUS INJECTOR REMOVAL OR REPLACEMENT

    R/2018/378 · 25 Feb 2019

    25 Feb 2019

    Defect

    An incorrect tightening torque was applied at the moment of injector re-installation.

    Remedy

    Check the injector clamp bolt torque and replace the parts if necessary.

    Build window

    Built 8 Oct 2015 – 13 Dec 2017

    ~321 vehicles affected

  13. POSSIBILITY OF A FUEL LEAK

    R/2017/328 · 1 Feb 2018

    1 Feb 2018

    Defect

    In certain specific conditions fuel may leak from the low pressure line due to a compatibility issue between the fuel filter and fuel line connector.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles replace the fuel line connector and fit an improved filter.

    Build window

    Built 5 Oct 2015 – 4 Apr 2017

    ~4,818 vehicles affected

  14. BOLTS ON THE EXHAUST SIDE OF THE TURBOCHARGER ASSEMBLY MAY BE INCORRECTLY TIGHTENED

    R/2017/329 · 29 Jan 2018

    29 Jan 2018

    Defect

    Affected vehicles have a 2.0 litre turbocharged diesel engine. There is a possibility that the bolts on the exhaust-side of the turbocharger assembly may not have been correctly tightened during manufacture.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles check bolts. Where necessary replace the turbocharger.

    Build window

    Built 22 Aug 2016 – 29 Sep 2016

    ~442 vehicles affected

  15. SEATBELT MAY NOT PERFORM AS DESIGNED

    R/2016/024 · 11 Apr 2016

    11 Apr 2016

    Defect

    In the event of a high-speed collision principally in the frontal direction there is a possibility that the lap belt webbing on the outboard seats of the second row could contact a portion of the seat cushion frame become cut and separate.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles fit a plastic protector to the seat frame.

    Build window

    Built 4 Feb 2012 – 11 Jun 2012

    ~49,015 vehicles affected

  16. SEATBELT MAY NOT PERFORM AS DESIGNED

    R/2016/024 · 11 Apr 2016

    11 Apr 2016

    Defect

    In the event of a high-speed collision principally in the frontal direction there is a possibility that the lap belt webbing on the outboard seats of the second row could contact a portion of the seat cushion frame become cut and separate.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles fit a plastic protector to the seat frame.

    Build window

    Built 21 Aug 2009 – 19 Nov 2012

    ~49,015 vehicles affected

  17. SEATBELT MAY NOT PERFORM AS DESIGNED

    R/2016/024 · 11 Apr 2016

    11 Apr 2016

    Defect

    In the event of a high-speed collision principally in the frontal direction there is a possibility that the lap belt webbing on the outboard seats of the second row could contact a portion of the seat cushion frame become cut and separate.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles fit a plastic protector to the seat frame.

    Build window

    Built 31 Oct 2005 – 16 Nov 2012

    ~49,015 vehicles affected

  18. RISK OF FIRE

    R/2015/206 · 1 Dec 2015

    1 Dec 2015

    Defect

    Affected vehicles are equipped with a driver�s side Power Window Master Switch (PWMS) containing sliding electrical contact modules. These modules may not have been incorrectly coated during the manufacturing process. This may cause a short circuit which could cause the switch to overheat and melt

    Remedy

    Inspect switch and apply coating. If switch indicates signs of malfunction it should be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 13 Jun 2005 – 31 Dec 2010

    ~123,306 vehicles affected

  19. DRIVER SIDE AIRBAG MAY RUPTURE

    R/2015/095 · 22 Jun 2015

    22 Jun 2015

    Defect

    Subject vehicles are fitted with driver's air bag assemblies with single stage inflators. There is an increases potential for moisture ingress which could make the inflator more susceptible to rupture during deployment. Fragments may injure occupants.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected to replace the airbag.

    Build window

    Built 4 Jul 2003 – 25 Oct 2005

  20. DRIVER SIDE AIRBAG MAY RUPTURE

    R/2015/095 · 22 Jun 2015

    22 Jun 2015

    Defect

    Subject vehicles are fitted with driver's air bag assemblies with single stage inflators. There is an increases potential for moisture ingress which could make the inflator more susceptible to rupture during deployment. Fragments may injure occupants.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected to replace the airbag.

    Build window

    Built 2 Jul 2003 – 31 Dec 2005

  21. DRIVERS AIRBAG MAY NOT FUNCTION

    R/2014/048 · 22 Apr 2014

    22 Apr 2014

    Defect

    The steering column assembly in affected vehicles contains electrical connections to the driver's air bag module housed in a spiral cable assembly which includes a Flexible Flat Cable (FFC). Due to the shape and location of the FFC's retainer the FFC could contact a small point of the retainer and become damaged when the steering wheel is turned. In FFC's with seven channel circuits this damage could occur to a circuit on the FFC that provides connectivity to the driver's air bag module. If connectivity is lost the air bag warning light will illuminate. In addition the driver's air bag could become deactivated causing it not to deploy in the event of a crash. This could increase the risk of injury to the driver.

    Remedy

    Replace spiral cables with new ones

    Build window

    Built 7 Dec 2006 – 29 Jun 2007

    ~26,210 vehicles affected

  22. DRIVERS AIRBAG MAY NOT FUNCTION

    R/2014/048 · 22 Apr 2014

    22 Apr 2014

    Defect

    The steering column assembly in affected vehicles contains electrical connections to the driver's air bag module housed in a spiral cable assembly which includes a Flexible Flat Cable (FFC). Due to the shape and location of the FFC's retainer the FFC could contact a small point of the retainer and become damaged when the steering wheel is turned. In FFC's with seven channel circuits this damage could occur to a circuit on the FFC that provides connectivity to the driver's air bag module. If connectivity is lost the air bag warning light will illuminate. In addition the driver's air bag could become deactivated causing it not to deploy in the event of a crash. This could increase the risk of injury to the driver.

    Remedy

    Replace spiral cables with new ones

    Build window

    Built 4 Jul 2007 – 8 Jul 2008

    ~26,210 vehicles affected

  23. DRIVERS AIRBAG MAY NOT FUNCTION

    R/2014/048 · 22 Apr 2014

    22 Apr 2014

    Defect

    The steering column assembly in affected vehicles contains electrical connections to the driver's air bag module housed in a spiral cable assembly which includes a Flexible Flat Cable (FFC). Due to the shape and location of the FFC's retainer the FFC could contact a small point of the retainer and become damaged when the steering wheel is turned. In FFC's with seven channel circuits this damage could occur to a circuit on the FFC that provides connectivity to the driver's air bag module. If connectivity is lost the air bag warning light will illuminate. In addition the driver's air bag could become deactivated causing it not to deploy in the event of a crash. This could increase the risk of injury to the driver.

    Remedy

    Replace spiral cables with new ones

    Build window

    Built 3 Nov 2005 – 28 Nov 2008

    ~26,210 vehicles affected

  24. FIRE MAY OCCUR

    R/2012/118 · 26 Oct 2012

    26 Oct 2012

    Defect

    It is possible moisture or other fluids may enter the drivers window and contaminate the main power window switch. If this occurs and the switch is damaged it could overheat and cause it to melt and/or smoke. If this situation is not identified it could result in a vehicle fire.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles and check the switch. If the switch is not damaged a waterproof cover will be fitted. If the switch is damaged it will be replaced and a waterproof cover will be fitted.

    Build window

    Built 1 Sep 2006 – 2 Dec 2008

    ~138,049 vehicles affected

  25. REAR SUSPENSION ARM MAY SEPARATE

    R/2012/085 · 12 Sep 2012

    12 Sep 2012

    Defect

    If the rear suspension arm is adjusted as part of a wheel alignment or other repairs whilst in service it is possible that backlash can occur. This can allow corrosion to develop and cause the threads to deteriorate. Ultimately this could result in failure of the arm with a resultant loss of control of the vehicle.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles to check the torque on the arm. Where necessary the arm will be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 31 Oct 2005 – 31 Aug 2010

    ~65,863 vehicles affected

  26. REAR SUSPENSION ARM MAY SEPARATE

    R/2012/085 · 12 Sep 2012

    12 Sep 2012

    Defect

    If the rear suspension arm is adjusted as part of a wheel alignment or other repairs whilst in service it is possible that backlash can occur. This can allow corrosion to develop and cause the threads to deteriorate. Ultimately this could result in failure of the arm with a resultant loss of control of the vehicle.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles to check the torque on the arm. Where necessary the arm will be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 31 Oct 2005 – 31 Oct 2010

    ~65,863 vehicles affected

  27. REAR SUSPENSION ARM MAY SEPARATE

    R/2012/085 · 12 Sep 2012

    12 Sep 2012

    Defect

    If the rear suspension arm is adjusted as part of a wheel alignment or other repairs whilst in service it is possible that backlash can occur. This can allow corrosion to develop and cause the threads to deteriorate. Ultimately this could result in failure of the arm with a resultant loss of control of the vehicle.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles to check the torque on the arm. Where necessary the arm will be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 31 Oct 2008 – 31 Aug 2010

    ~65,863 vehicles affected

  28. REAR SUSPENSION ARM MAY SEPARATE

    R/2012/085 · 12 Sep 2012

    12 Sep 2012

    Defect

    If the rear suspension arm is adjusted as part of a wheel alignment or other repairs whilst in service it is possible that backlash can occur. This can allow corrosion to develop and cause the threads to deteriorate. Ultimately this could result in failure of the arm with a resultant loss of control of the vehicle.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles to check the torque on the arm. Where necessary the arm will be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 31 Aug 2005 – 31 Aug 2010

    ~65,863 vehicles affected

  29. ACCELERATOR PEDAL MAY FAIL TO RETURN TO IDLE

    R/2010/010 · 6 Feb 2010

    6 Feb 2010

    Defect

    It has been identified that on affected vehicles condensation resulting from cold-weather use of the heater or other causes may form on the worn surface of a component within the throttle pedal assembly known as the friction device. If this occurs there is a possibility that in the worst case the accelerator pedal may return slowly or does not return to the engine idle position.

    Remedy

    Recalled vehicles will have a precision-cut steel reinforcing bar fitted into the accelerator pedal assembly which will create a space in order to reduce the surface tension between the friction device and a component referred to as the pedal arm. The subject bar also strengthens the reaction force of the spring that returns the accelerator pedal to it's non-pressed position.

    Build window

    Affected build dates not specified

    ~174,426 vehicles affected

  30. FRONT COIL SPRING MAY FRACTURE RESULTING IN THE POSSIBILITY OF TYRE DAMAGE

    R/2006/012 · 9 Aug 2006

    9 Aug 2006

    Defect

    Due to insufficient surface treatment prior to painting the paint on the front coil springs may not have adhered properly. This can render the spring susceptible to corrosion in environments where road salt is used. Prolonged use of the vehicle in this condition may cause the spring to fracture which in extreme cases can lead to tyre damage.

    Remedy

    Recalled vehicles will have both front coil springs replaced with quality assured items.

    Build window

    Built 19 May 1995 – 31 Jul 1995

    ~1,998 vehicles affected

  31. AIRBAGS MAY NOT INFLATE DURING A COLLISION

    R/2006/057 · 26 Jul 2006

    26 Jul 2006

    Defect

    Due to improper assembly of the airbag inflator used in the side airbag curtain shield airbag and knee airbag systems the subject airbags may not fully inflate during a collision resulting in an increased risk of injury to the vehicle's occupants.

    Remedy

    Recalled vehicles will have the subject airbags replaced.

    Build window

    Built 18 Sep 2003 – 2 Sep 2005

    ~11 vehicles affected

  32. ROAD WHEEL SPOKES MAY CRACK AND SEPARATE

    R/2006/049 · 6 Jun 2006

    6 Jun 2006

    Defect

    It has been identified that steel wheels of insufficient strength have been fitted to some grades of RAV4 vehicles fitted with diesel engines. The possibility then exist that a crack may appear on the spoke(s) of the wheel which in the worst case could cause the spoke to separate.

    Remedy

    Affected vehicles will have their wheels replaced with those of an improved quality.

    Build window

    Built 4 Jul 2001 – 15 Sep 2004

    ~851 vehicles affected

Data from the DVSA Vehicle Recall register (Crown Copyright, Open Government Licence v3.0). Last indexed: 2026-04-26.

These records are provided for reference. Contact your authorised Toyota dealer or check your vehicle registration at gov.uk/check-if-a-vehicle-has-outstanding-recalls to confirm current status.

All makes

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Recall remedy booked. Mechanic next?

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →