MOT cost .

Renault

Twingo

11 UK vehicle recalls on record for this model, listed most recent first.

If your Twingo is covered by any of these notices, contact your authorised Renault dealer. All recall work is carried out free of charge.

Notices on record

11

Renault Twingo

Recall match · this page only

Does any recall apply to your car?

Enter your reg and we'll match the build date on your vehicle record against the recall windows below — hiding notices that can't apply to your vehicle. Wrong make or model? We'll send you to the right recall page.

Looking for full MOT history, advisories, or pass-rate stats? Use the reg checker →

GB

Reg saved only in this browser; we never log it server-side. The lookup runs once against the official records each time you submit.

All recall notices.

  1. RISK OF DEGRADATION TO THE FRONT LEFT SUB AXLE CARRIER

    R/2017/313 · 28 Nov 2017

    28 Nov 2017

    Defect

    Depending on driving style and road profile there is a risk of degradation of the front left sub axle carrier.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and checking the front left stub axle carrier casting number Where necessary replace the stub axle carrier.

    Build window

    Affected build dates not specified

    ~187 vehicles affected

  2. OUTER SKIN OF REAR SPOILER MAY DETACH

    R/2017/135 · 9 May 2017

    9 May 2017

    Defect

    The outer part (skin) of the rear spoiler may detach from the vehicle and /or the pins on the glass tailgate. There would be no warning to the customer. However the possibility of detachment is increased due to the use of car washes.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and fit additional re-enforcement to the spoiler and bonnet.

    Build window

    Built 7 May 2014 – 10 Dec 2016

    ~5,623 vehicles affected

  3. OUTER SKIN OF REAR SPOILER AND BONNET MAY DETACH

    R/2017/136 · 9 May 2017

    9 May 2017

    Defect

    Operations 1) or 2) or operations 1) and 2) could be required: 1) The upper part of the bonnet (the bonnet skin) may detach from the rest of the bonnet due to poor adhesive being applied at the factory and deterioration over time. There would be no obvious signs to the customer. 2) The outer part (skin) of the rear spoiler may detach from the vehicle and /or the pins on the glass tailgate. There would be no warning to the customer.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and add re-enforcement to the spoiler and/or bonnet or both as required.

    Build window

    Built 7 May 2014 – 6 Jul 2015

    ~4,056 vehicles affected

  4. POSSIBILITY OF LOSS OF CONTROL

    R/2015/132 · 23 Jun 2015

    23 Jun 2015

    Defect

    The front shock absorber (strut) mounting for the anti-roll bar rod may not be welded correctly. If the welding should fail there will initially be noise leading to the possibility for adversely affected vehicle handling because the anti-roll bar will no longer be connected the risk of contact and damage to the wheel rim tyre brake hose and ABS cable.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and check the shocker absorber (strut) build dates. The shock absorber that are in the affected range will be replaced.

    Build window

    Built 26 May 2014 – 30 Oct 2014

    ~1,022 vehicles affected

  5. RISK OF UNINTENDED ACCELERATION

    R/2015/075 · 26 Mar 2015

    26 Mar 2015

    Defect

    Due to an error in the engine ECU software it is possible that the vehicle will suffer an unintended acceleration or not able to decelerate. The driver should still be able to control the vehicle by applying the brakes and manipulating the clutch and gears.

    Remedy

    Recall all affected vehicles to reprogram the engine ECU with new software.

    Build window

    Built 13 Jun 2014 – 15 Dec 2014

    ~1,115 vehicles affected

  6. SEATBELTS MAY MALFUNCTION IN A COLLISION

    R/2015/065 · 26 Mar 2015

    26 Mar 2015

    Defect

    Due to an error in the manufacturing process the seat belt buckle may not retain the belt during a frontal impact.

    Remedy

    On affected vehicles check build date of seat belt assembly and replace if necessary.

    Build window

    Built 29 Sep 2014 – 29 Oct 2014

    ~393 vehicles affected

  7. SEATBELT BUCKLE MAY NOT HOLD SEATBELT TONGUE

    R/2014/179 · 10 Mar 2015

    10 Mar 2015

    Defect

    Seat belt tongue may not hold in the buckle sufficiently. In a collision the tongue may separate from the buckle putting the occupant of the affected belt at risk.

    Remedy

    Recall the vehicles that are likely to be affected and replace the seatbelt buckle on the passenger side (x 75) and driver side (x6).

    Build window

    Built 20 Oct 2014 – 7 Nov 2014

    ~393 vehicles affected

  8. DRIVERS SEAT MAY NOT LOCK SAFELY

    R/2009/093 · 6 Oct 2009

    6 Oct 2009

    Defect

    It has been identified that the driver's seat may suffer permanent or intermittent non-locking on it's runners. This can occur when the vehicle is stationary or when being driven..

    Remedy

    Recalled vehicles will have a latch fitted to the seat's locking device.

    Build window

    Built 1 Sep 2008 – 28 Feb 2009

    ~663 vehicles affected

  9. POSSIBLE LOSS OF BRAKE SERVO ASSISTANCE

    R/2002/156 · 2 Dec 2002

    2 Dec 2002

    Defect

    There is a risk of a loss of brake servo assistance due to the incorrect positioning of the air pressure sensor in the inlet manifold.

    Remedy

    Check the position of the air pressure sensor and correct where necessary.

    Build window

    Built 16 Apr 2002 – 27 Jun 2002

    ~1,861 vehicles affected

  10. DOOR SECURITY CONCERN

    R/2001/161 · 10 Jan 2002

    10 Jan 2002

    Defect

    Customers may find that they are unable to secure the front and side doors of their vehicles due to wear of the locking bolt due to omission of heat treatment.

    Remedy

    Rectified by replacing both the front and side door locks.

    Build window

    Built 23 May 2001 – 30 Jun 2001

    ~1,445 vehicles affected

  11. POSSIBLE INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF BOTH AIRBAGS

    R/2000/072 · 18 Sep 2000

    18 Sep 2000

    Defect

    The computer which controls the deployment of the Airbags may be incorrectly programmed. The Airbags may inadvertently deploy.

    Remedy

    Recall affected vehicles and change the computer which controls the deployment of the Airbags.

    Build window

    Affected build dates not specified

    ~17 vehicles affected

Click Mechanic · affiliate

Recall affects you? Book a mobile mechanic to handle the fix.

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Full MOT history

Want pass rate, advisories + 12-test history?

The reg checker pulls your full MOT history + this model's UK fleet stats. Recalls live here; everything else lives there.

Open the reg checker →

Cost estimator

What would the recall fix actually cost?

Recall remedies are free at a main dealer. If the recall window doesn't cover you, the estimator gives a real UK garage range for likely fixes.

Run the estimator →

Last indexed: 2026-04-26.

These records are provided for reference. Contact your authorised Renault dealer or check your vehicle registration at gov.uk/check-vehicle-recall to confirm current status.

All makes