MOT cost .

Comparison

Vauxhall Astra vs Ford Focus: the family hatch British sale duel

Focus +1.67pp

By Jacob Cartwright · Founder & editor Published · Updated

Astra vs Focus, The British Family-Hatch Argument

The Ford Focus wins this comparison, but the Vauxhall Astra keeps it close enough that a clean individual Astra can still be the smarter used buy. Across the 2024 public UK MOT record, the Focus has the higher first-time pass rate, the bigger sample, and the stronger showing in the two age bands that matter most to normal used-family-hatch buyers.

The headline numbers are blunt. The Astra recorded 1,150,896 tests and passed first time at 72.5%. The Focus recorded 1,667,364 tests and passed at 74.17%.

That leaves the Astra 1.67 percentage points behind. It is not a demolition. It is a proper volume-car split, and it gives the Focus the edge when age, price and condition are otherwise level.

The more useful question is what sits under that gap. These are two of Britain’s default family hatchbacks: commuter cars, school-run cars, ex-fleet cars, cheap second cars, motorway cars, and plenty of tired examples being kept alive because replacing them costs more. The MOT record does not tell you which cabin feels better or which diesel pulls more neatly. It tells you what fails when the cars are put on the ramp.

Pass-Rate Split

The Focus leads the Astra 74.17% to 72.5% on 2024 first-time MOT pass rate. On a tiny sample, that would be a shrug. Here it lands across 2,818,260 recorded tests, so the gap deserves respect.

The Focus also has the bigger fleet in the record: about 516,000 more recorded tests than the Astra. That matters because the result has had more chance to flatten out oddities. A model with this many tests is not being made to look good by a handful of cherished examples.

Still, the Astra is not embarrassed. A 72.5% pass rate from more than 1.15 million tests is the result of a mass-market car doing mass-market work. It is not a fragile outlier. It is just beaten by a rival that comes through the test lane slightly more cleanly.

For used buyers, the gap is big enough to influence a shortlist, not big enough to overrule the car in front of you. A Focus with repeat advisories for tyres, springs, lamps and bushes is not better than a tidy Astra with clean history. But if both cars are the same age, same money, same mileage, and equally convincing underneath, the Focus has the better underlying record.

There is also a fuel-mix angle. The Astra record is roughly 69% petrol and 31% diesel. The Focus is roughly 67% petrol and 33% diesel. Both are petrol-led, but neither comparison is being warped by one car being almost all diesel and the other not. The Focus has a slightly higher diesel share and still wins the pass-rate fight.

That makes the Ford result harder to brush off.

Where They Fail

The Astra’s top failure reasons are ordinary, but they say plenty about how these cars age:

  • Spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened: 40,261
  • Rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: 31,832
  • Tyre tread depth below the requirement: 26,334
  • Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm: 24,944
  • Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured: 20,858

The Astra list is a mixture of age, owner neglect and consumables. Springs at the top is the big signal. That is potholes, corrosion, heavy use, and cars being kept long enough for suspension parts to become test-stopping items. Number-plate lamps and tyres are more owner-behaviour faults. They are easy to spot before a test, which means repeat appearances in the history tell you something about the maintenance culture around the car.

Brake pads being fourth is also worth watching. It is not a catastrophic model flaw, but it does tell buyers to look beyond the fresh MOT certificate. If the car only just escaped a brake fail last year, check whether the work was actually done or whether it is still living in the advisory section.

The Focus top five look similar at first glance, then slightly broader:

  • Tyre tread depth below the requirement: 40,405
  • Spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened: 33,205
  • Lamp missing or more than half not functioning: 30,718
  • Rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative: 30,327
  • Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn: 30,137

Tyres lead the Focus list. Springs are close behind. Lamps are high. Suspension bushes and joints sit in the top five. That is the classic tired-family-hatch package: rubber, steel, bulbs and bushes, all arriving late to the workshop.

The Focus does not win because it has a lovely failure profile. It wins because, across the whole record, fewer cars fail first time. The faults that do show up are still the ones you need to inspect before buying.

The Astra often gives itself away with the spring area first: uneven stance, a fresh shiny coil on one corner, or a knock that changes when the car is loaded. The Focus more often feels like a whole front-end check. Tyres, bushes, lamps and springs can all be part of the same neglected story.

If you are standing in a driveway with either car, do not be hypnotised by a clean body and a tidy infotainment screen. Look at tyre dates and tread wear, check all lamps, listen over broken surfaces, and read the MOT history for repeats. Repeated small failures are often a clearer warning than one big repair.

Cohort Tells

The all-age number blends cars that are barely old enough for a first test with cars that have been through a decade of winter salt, speed bumps and budget tyres. The by-year-band split is where the comparison gets useful.

For pre-2018 cars, the Astra recorded 1,077,958 tests and passed 71.63% first time. The Focus recorded 1,444,382 tests and passed 72.23%. That is a narrow Ford win, but it matters because this is the biggest and most buyer-relevant cohort. It is where cheap family hatchbacks live.

The older-car gap is only 0.60 points. That is not enough to buy a Focus blindly. It is enough to say the Ford does a little better when the cars are old, worn and exposed to the kind of maintenance decisions owners make when values fall.

For 2018-2020 cars, the Focus lead becomes clearer. The Astra passes at 85.02% from 69,966 tests. The Focus passes at 86.55% from 201,700 tests. That 1.53-point split lines up neatly with the overall picture. It also comes from a larger Focus sample, which gives the Ford number more weight.

The newest bucket flips the result. For 2021-on cars, the Astra passes at 90.68% from 2,972 tests, while the Focus passes at 88.09% from 21,282 tests. The Astra deserves the point there, but the sample is small compared with the older groups. Newer-car MOT data is also less revealing because most examples have not yet had enough time to expose age-related suspension, lamp, tyre and corrosion patterns.

The fair read is this: Focus wins the cohorts that carry the verdict. Astra wins the newest cohort, but that is not enough to overturn the older and middle-age evidence.

That also makes the buying advice more precise. If you are shopping a pre-2018 Astra or Focus, condition and history beat badge. If you are shopping 2018-2020, the Focus has the better statistical footing. If you are shopping 2021-on, the Astra result is interesting, but the individual car still matters more than the model average.

Mileage Tells

Mileage complicates the Focus win.

The Astra’s average mileage at test is 89,706. The Focus average is 84,252. So the Astra is arriving with about 5,454 more miles on the clock and only losing by 1.67 points. That gives Vauxhall a fair defence: the Astra fleet is a little more worn by mileage and still remains close.

The older cohort sharpens that point. Pre-2018 Astras average 92,739 miles at test. Pre-2018 Focuses average 91,091. That is a small mileage advantage against the Astra, and the pass-rate gap is only 0.60 points. In the real used market, that means a 2016 Astra with good history can easily be a better buy than a 2016 Focus with sketchy advisories.

The 2018-2020 band is different. Astras average 45,837 miles and pass at 85.02%. Focuses average 41,355 miles and pass at 86.55%. The Ford is lower mileage and cleaner at test, so it wins, but not in a way that proves the Astra is weak. It proves the Focus is the neater average bet in that age window.

For 2021-on cars, the Astra averages 27,423 miles and the Focus 30,478. The Astra passes better while carrying fewer miles. That is a good result for newer Astras, but the test count is too small to make it the centre of the argument.

The Focus wins the pass-rate fight. The Astra’s defence is mileage: it is doing slightly harder duty across the whole record.

That is why this comparison should not be read as “Focus good, Astra bad”. It is more useful than that. The Focus is the better percentage play. The Astra is close enough that maintenance history can easily swing the answer.

The Numbers We Trust

This post uses 2024 official UK records for vauxhall__astra and ford__focus.

The combined sample is 2,818,260 recorded tests. The Astra contributes 1,150,896. The Focus contributes 1,667,364. That is a serious volume duel, and it suits the brief: these are not rare enthusiast cars, they are ordinary British family hatchbacks doing ordinary British work.

The record is still not a full reliability database. It does not tell you every clutch, turbo, injector, infotainment, water leak or gearbox story. It mostly sees roadworthiness: tyres, brakes, suspension, steering, structure, emissions, lights, visibility and safety equipment.

It also counts tests, not unique vehicles. A car can appear more than once in a year if it fails, is repaired, and returns for a retest. That makes test count a measure of recorded MOT activity, not a clean count of individual cars on the road.

The by-year-band split is broad as well. It groups cars by first-use date, not engine code, trim, body style, ownership type or service quality. A low-mile petrol Astra, an ex-fleet diesel Astra, a battered Focus estate and a cherished private Focus hatch can all sit under broad model records.

Those limits do not break the comparison. They just tell you how to use it. The Focus has the better 2024 first-time pass rate. It leads overall, leads pre-2018, and leads 2018-2020. The Astra has higher average mileage and a better newest-cohort result, but not enough to take the verdict.

For buying, the checks are practical. On the Astra, be strict around springs, rear number-plate lamps, tyres, brake pads and windscreen damage. A history full of spring advisories or repeat brake warnings is not background noise. It is the car asking for money.

On the Focus, be strict around tyre tread, springs, lamps, suspension bushes and joints. A Focus can feel sharp on a short test drive while still carrying worn bushes, mismatched tyres and lazy lamp maintenance. Read the history before the viewing, then use it as an inspection list.

Verdict

The Ford Focus wins. It passes first time more often in the 2024 record, has the larger test sample, and leads the Astra in the two most useful age bands: pre-2018 and 2018-2020.

The Astra is not a weak choice. It carries higher average mileage at test, stays close on the headline pass rate, and looks better in the small 2021-on cohort. But on equal condition, equal age and equal price, the Focus is the cleaner family-hatch pick. Buy the Astra when the individual history is clearly better; buy the Focus when the cars are otherwise level.

Mobile mechanic · pre-purchase inspection

Want a second opinion before you buy either of these?

Affiliate links — small commission, no extra cost to you.

Mobile mechanic · UK-wide

Book a mechanic at your door.

Fixed-price quotes upfront. No garage needed. Click Mechanic sends a vetted local mechanic to you — home, work, or roadside.

Get a quote →

Commercial links above do not affect our findings. The product shown is the one our data points at, not the one that pays best. How we decide →

Embed this chart

Copy & paste this into your CMS:

Renders the live chart from MOTCost. Required attribution is built in.